THE METHOD — WHAT EACH ENGAGEMENT RUNS ON.
The engagements above run on one repeatable path, not a bespoke plan each time. It exists because the same failures recur, in the same order, and the sequence that closes them is known.
- 01SpecifyWrite the system properties down first — latency budget, safety envelope, failure modes, what 'working' means and who decides. Most pilots never have this document, which is why they cannot be judged.
- 02InstrumentBuild the eval harness and the observability before the model. If a regression cannot be detected, it will be discovered by a customer.
- 03HardenPartition tolerance, bounded agent authority, deterministic control boundaries, rollback. The parts that only matter on the day something fails.
- 04TransferThe weights, the harness, the runbook and the judgement calls are documented and handed over. The engagement is designed to end.
This method is the one behind Auralink — Hyperion's own pre-production reference implementation, roughly 1.7 million lines of code with 24 agent types across 400+ microservices. It is internal R&D, not a client deployment, and it is where the sequence above was worked out rather than theorised.
Reachy Mini + SO-101
SIMULATION- 68.71 GBMeasuredπ0.5 full fine-tune — peak memory
- 1.08 → 0.13 (300 steps)MeasuredReal fine-tune (LIBERO, language-conditioned) — loss
- 0% → 96%SimulationSimulation success (LIBERO-Spatial) — base → fine-tuned
This is measurement-and-feasibility work, not a finished product. Every number below is labelled measured, simulation or dry-run — and what is not yet measured is stated plainly.
Auralink
MEASURED- ~1.7 million lines of code
- 400+ microservices
- 24 AI agents
- 78% autonomous incident resolution in simulated operations
Built and owned by Hyperion to prove the method — not external client deployments.